A case was brought on his behalf against him and other issues that were in violation of his Constitutional rights because he was jailed for so long with no charges filed. The before his case was to be heard by the Supreme Court charges were finally filed against him evening. It really is believed that it was only done this that the Supreme Court wouldn’t normally hear the full case considering that the Bush Administration might have been found guilty of wrongdoing. Ironically, no charges were filed that had to do using the allegations of his supposed involvement to detonate a “dirty bomb.” He had been charged with lesser and less crimes that are specific Attorney General Ashcroft had stated as he was detained that the evidence against Padilla was overwhelming. Before he had been set to face trial, Padilla’s attorney tried to argue that due to the torture he was afflicted by additionally the length of time he had been detained he was not mentally competent to face trial. A judge ruled he was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 17 years in prison (Martinez, 2007) that he was competent and.
On Monday April 4th, 2011 the House of Representatives reviewed the Patriot Act and voted to extend it to the 8th of December, giving the ability towards the Federal Bureau of Investigation and several other federal agencies to still use roving wiretaps among other powers that overstep our rights that are constitutional. February 28th, 2011 was considered to be the last day for the Patriot Act since no new legislation had been passed. With this particular extension, America waits for hearings to be held because of the Judiciary Committee. When it came right down to voting for the extension many Republicans voted because of it and Democrats argued against the extension. However, what was a shock to numerous was the fact that sixty-five Democrats voted when it comes to extension of this Patriot Act. One out of particular, Democratic Representative C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger from Maryland, the highest democrat that is ranking the Intelligence Committee, would like to see this extension most of the way right through to 2013. Lots of the 27 Republicans who voted from the extension, such as for instance Dana Rohrabacher, believe the American individuals will face the best danger of out-of-control prosecutions along with the potential for out-of-control spy networks taking effect.
Groups like the privacy that is electronic Center (EPIC) as well as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are fighting for reform of the Patriot Act. The ACLU believes that law enforcement agencies will require benefit of the bill and make use of with this power to trouble innocent members of the communities that are muslim-American. On March 30th, 2011, the ACLU appeared prior to the House subcommittee from the dependence on reform of the Patriot Act, arguing that the federal government monitoring of communications with no proof is a violation associated with American peoples’ basic Amendment rights. Senator Patrick Leahy felt which he will never support the extension given that it did absolutely nothing to uphold the government’s accountability. EPIC used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIP) to get reports on intelligence law violations from the Intelligence Oversight Board. EPIC has spoken on one or more occasion towards the Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Attorney General to report to Congress any unlawful investigations under the Patriot Act, yet this battle still continues today.
The lives of both US citizens and immigrant are influenced by the power associated with Patriot Act.
For example, foreigners who seek education through grants, non-citizens seeking to gain residency that is permanent citizenship, visas and work permits in the United States are being scrutinized under the new requirement system for the Patriot Act. One very high ranking official in the usa Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) made it clear if you will find any doubts regarding an applicant’s eligibility then they will receive disapproval. More government that is stringent and thorough criminal record checks are just another obstacle developed by the Patriot Act. These rules that are new the Patriot Act also opposed to the majority of the checks and balances from the Bill of Rights that has been placed into destination to protect citizens’ privacy. In those days, misuse of surveillance powers by law enforcement agencies were uncovered, including the 1974 revelation that the FBI and foreign intelligence agencies had spied on over 10,000 U.S. citizens, including Martin Luther King Jr. Today, citizens utilising the internet into the privacy of their home feel a discomfort with what they do because their actions are susceptible to review if the government suspects they truly are participating in anything terrorist related. For internet surfers, it opens the entranceway for widespread surveillance of web surfing, e-mails and peer-to-peer systems. Also place in the center of the arguments are companies and libraries that are public need certainly to turn over any potentially incriminating documents accessed through their systems, at the request of federal law enforcement agencies, without giving any notification to their customers.
In my opinion that one areas of the Patriot Act are feasible, but just with intensive oversight not merely from Congress, but in addition through the Supreme Court. Congress can may play a role by making certain the laws they pass do not not in favor of the protections promised to Americans into the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments regarding the Constitution. The Supreme Court could continue steadily to review cases to ensure the Constitution is upheld even though it comes down to cases that deal with suspected terrorists which can be American citizens. Our laws have made this country what it is but it is feared that money maybe the downfall of our nation today. The freedom of life, property and liberty has turned into greed. Terrorist acts against the US terrify many Americans, however in many cases, power and money scares them more. The people vote to own government representation but the people must be more involved in your decision making process. In the event that you elect anyone to office and additionally they usually do not do the job correctly, it is as much as us as Americans to ensure that those people usually do not stay in office. That will simply be done if people have more active in the political process and not just be happy with what goes on type my paper for me.
The expression “land of this free” can be used too generously. The way in which it is now, the Patriot Act goes against everything that this country stands for and deprives all of us of your liberties that are civil. Some argue that it is necessary to maintain order, but you cannot give limitless power to a few and expect items to turn out well. In the event that Patriot Act will be kept as law, the people it accountable who overstep or abuse the power given to them that we elect to the House of Representatives (House) and Senate need to hold the people who use. Also, the president shouldn’t be the factor that is deciding deeming a person a “threat” or “enemy combatant” when giving a person such a title strips them of basic human rights. They are occupying, it should be unacceptable for authorities to use tactics that are considered torture when trying to elicit information from an individual, whether that person be an American citizen or not if it is unacceptable for soldiers in war to commit crimes against the people of the nation.
The real history associated with Patriot Act actually dates back towards the eighteenth century under different laws put in place during war time to protect the US.
The protection of your nation is the highest and the most responsibility that is important of government. The laws created are supposed to be in the interest that is best regarding the citizens. After all, the citizens give the government the ability to maintain their welfare and to protect them. People who have this degree of power sometimes focus on the whole without rational as well as the individual has to pay the fee. There must be a limit in the power of this government, if the nation’s way of living, liberty and quest for property have been in jeopardy we need to think about the rational the us government uses when governing this nation. We can not as a nation just sit back and accept what exactly is being done. In order to elicit change, we need to stand up and do some worthwhile thing about it.