GP passes all recommendation information to admin group to help make the e-RS referral with the person

  1. GP and agree that is patient referral.
  2. GP dictates or types-up referral information for admin to grab, including information on any option conversation because of the client.
  3. GP Admin logs into e-RS and produces the recommendation on behalf of the GP, considering GP guidelines.

After which either:

4a – GP Admin delivers the individual the Appointment Request letter – client books appointment online or by phoning TAL.

4b – GP Admin contacts the in-patient and contains the decision conversation and books the visit – client gets the Appointment verification page by post or picks it through the surgery later on.

  • this model is really a completely admin-based procedure, so takes less GP time compared to the other models, but may necessitate more administrative abilities and resources
  • GP passes information for their admin group to pick appropriate solutions when it comes to client
  • GP continues to be accountable for the recommendation, so must be sure that admin staff have now been completely taught to handle this workflow (see area 9.2 below)
  • a rise in admin time could be offset by a decrease in the full time formerly invested by admin staff in chasing-up recommendations, as there was now a record that is electronic every action within the recommendation path
  • if GPs try not to monitor worklists on their own, exercise administration staff should check always them on a basis that is regular try to find any clients that have perhaps maybe maybe not scheduled, despite getting two system-generated reminder letters (delivered because of the NHS e-Referral provider). GPs have to be made alert to these non-booked appointments (procedures to be agreed locally) while making a decision that is clinical to whether or not the client nevertheless has to be observed. In these instances, where appropriate, clients must be contacted to support/encourage them in reserving a scheduled appointment
  • GP admin staff can make the referral that is clinical to increase the recommendation
  • GP Admin staff can book the visit for vulnerable clients or Two Week Wait recommendations, where they’re not scheduled into the assessment

GP makes recommendation and publications appointment inside the assessment

  1. GP and agree that is patient referral.
  2. GP produces recommendation and shortlists services that are suitable e-RS.
  3. GP publications visit in e-RS with patient (for 2WW, as an example).
  4. 4Patient leaves with Appointment verification page.
  • all occurs in the assessment
  • GP and confident that is patient the procedure and reassured that recommendation and scheduling is currently complete
  • this model is great for whenever referring susceptible clients, or making bi weekly Wait recommendations
  • will not permit the client to talk about the recommendation with friends/relatives and opt for provider, or find the visit time ahead of the initial visit is scheduled (although clients continue to have the chance to cancel and re-book a consultation at any point in the near future, if scheduled through e-RS)
  • client has a consultation scheduled immediately – improved satisfaction that is patient
  • where no appointments can be obtained, the GP can defer the visit and provide the patient the deferred appointment page that now suggests the individual to make contact with the provider (this is certainly – perhaps perhaps not the practice that is GP whether they have perhaps perhaps perhaps perhaps not heard any such thing inside a fortnight
  • no postage expenses, when compared with a number of the other scheduling models, as client leaves with visit details
  • reduced time invested monitoring worklists to check on that client has scheduled their visit
  • GP can make the medical recommendation information from their built-in GP system (or ask their admin staff to take action) at a later on, more time that is convenient

GP produces admin and shortlist team publications the visit aided by the client

  1. GP and patient agree to referral.
  2. GP produces recommendation and shortlists suitable solutions.
  3. GP Admin gets the option conversation and publications the visit aided by the patient.
  4. Individual actually leaves with, or perhaps is delivered, the Appointment verification page.
  • this model can create unneeded benefit admin staff and it is just required for the tiny wide range of clients that would never be in a position to book a consultation on line, or by phoning the nationwide scheduling line
  • GP and client could be confident that clinically proper choices are on the patient’s shortlist
  • admin staff might help patients that are vulnerable or those struggling to finish the scheduling process on their own, to book their visit at a location, date and time that matches them
  • this model would work for Two Week Wait appointments, (in the event that visit is certainly not scheduled in the assessment)
  • where no appointments can be obtained, GP admin staff can defer the visit and provide the patient the deferred appointment page that now suggests them to get hold of the provider (this is certainly – perhaps perhaps not the practice that is GP whether they have maybe maybe perhaps not heard any such thing inside a fortnight
  • no postage expenses, when compared with various other models, if done right following the GP visit since the client renders with visit details (although postage and/or phone expenses might be incurred in the event that practice contacts patient later)
  • paid down have to monitor worklists to make sure that the individual books a scheduled appointment
  • GP can make the medical recommendation information (or ask their admin staff to do this) at a later on, convenient time

6. Referral outcomes

As described in area 3 above, there are lots of results to a referral that is e-rs dependent on if it is converted to a bookable or an assessment/triage solution.

This is basically the outcome that is usual a recommendation is clinically suitable for the solution to which it’s been scheduled. The referrer has to simply simply take no action that is further. The referring practice can, at any time, see the status of the appointment by checking the Patient Activity why not look here List.

If, having browse the clinical recommendation information, a provider clinician seems that an alternate service could be clinically appropriate for an individual, then, in the place of rejecting the recommendation (see below), preferred plan of action should be to re-direct it up to a clinically more desirable solution. This is handled by the provider within e-RS while the client would be contacted to re-book their visit to the brand new solution. In this instance, there’s absolutely no action required from the the main GP or referring training.

Then the appointment and/or referral may be cancelled within e-RS if a provider (such as a hospital or community trust) is unable to book an appointment for a patient within e-RS, or the booked clinic/appointment subsequently becomes unavailable. Then the provider organisation will have added a reason in e-RS, which the referring practice will be able to view from their worklists if this happens. Duty for working with a provider termination rests utilizing the provider (that is – the community or hospital trust), that will usually manually re-book the client outside e-RS. This can show up on a referrer’s worklist for information just.

Then this will appear on the GP practice’s Awaiting Booking/Acceptance worklist, denoting that an appointment still needs to be booked if a provider (or a patient) cancels an appointment, but not the referral, and it is not rebooked. It’s usually for information just, as e-RS will be sending reminder letters towards the client, advising them to re-book. It can, nonetheless, stay the obligation associated with GP practice to make sure that the individual has scheduled a consultation, if nevertheless clinically appropriate.